论文总字数：58887字

2020 届毕业设计（论文）

题 目：Evaluation of the role of Talin-1 in liver

disease

专 业： Pharmacy

班 级： 1601

姓 名： SYED AI SAIDI

指导老师： Ye Zhao

起讫日期： 2020.03-2020.06

2020 年 6 月

Evaluation of the role of Talin-1 in liver disease

Abstract

Liver fibrosis is scar tissue in the liver and this regularly occurs after individuals have been influenced by liver condition that goes on for a long time or decades. Dynamic fibrosis can be to cirrhosis of the liver which put individuals in danger to create liver malignant growth or require a liver transplantation on the grounds that the liver is done working great. The hazard factors for liver fibrosis are for the most part interminable condition that influence a liver. Constant liver maladies may cause persevering aggravation and lead to dynamic redesigning because of fibrosis and vascular disturbances. Among these sicknesses, interminable contaminations with hepatitis B and additionally C infections (HBV and HCV, separately), relentless liquor utilization, insulin opposition related nonalcoholic steatohepatitis, immune system hepatobiliary ailments, and iron over-burden may all bring about liver cirrhosis and disappointment. Be that as it may, fruitful subsidence of the causative trigger stops fibrosis movement and conveys the capability of significant fibrosis inversion. As of late there is pattern towards non-obtrusive conclusion of liver fibrosis and entrance hypertension. Serum talin-1 out of an ongoing report was a helpful biomarker of HCC. In incessant liver diseases, for instance, liver fibrosis and dangerous development, the liver is firm or solidified on account of the ceaseless activation of hepatic stellate cells or passage vein fibroblasts as the matrix of myofibroblasts. In this survey, we concluded that talin-1 has potential activity in decreasing the improvement of liver fibrosis through the flagging pathways of integrins in the setting of master fibrotic liver injury.

Key words: Liver fibrosis, Talin-1, Cirrhosis

Title: Evaluation, Mechanisms and role of Talin-1 in Liver Diseases.

Liver disease

The liver is an essential organ in the human body as it performs many functions; its prime function is replacing damaged cells. The liver malfunction can be caused by factors that can be controlled by an individual (alcohol consumption and obesity), and that can’t be controlled (for example, viral infection or adverse reaction to drugs; and genetic conditions). Damage to the liver can be both asymptomatic and symptomatic. Severe scarring of the tissue (cirrhosis) can lead to liver cancer. Some acute liver failures can be cured and others cannot be cured. Non-alcoholic liver failure, if detected early, may be cured by medication and changes in the life style.

Liver disease development including focal adhesion, ECM, and their roles in cirrhosis or fibrosis

Cell adhesion is the key factor of cell movement in embryogenesis, inflammation, wound healing and tumor metastasis. The formation of focal adhesion is caused by cell adhesion, which is a controlled process related to cell movement. Cell adhesion molecules, such as integrin, regulate many physiological and pathological mechanisms through the interaction between them and the extracellular environment.

The importance of integrins in the evolution and development of some cancers has been recognized for a while. However, recent evidence has highlighted the important role played by integrins in non-malignant processes, such as organ fibrosis and inflammation. Hepatic fibrosis is the consistent response of liver tissue to chronic injury. It is the result of matrix formation acceleration and degradation damage. Part of it is caused by chronic inflammation.

Focal adhesion kinase (FAK) is a cytoplasmic protein tyrosine kinase, which plays an important role in integrin mediated signal transduction. In addition, some evidences show that FAK is a junction of other signaling pathways. Focal adhesion (FAS) is a complex assembly of plasma membrane related macromolecules, which binds to extracellular matrix through integrin receptor, and connects to actin cytoskeleton through the recruitment of a large number of FA related proteins.

There are many causes of chronic liver injury for example, viral hepatitis, liquor addiction, sedate actuated liver injury, heftiness and insulin obstruction, metabolic clutters and autoimmune diseases, which are characterized by the over deposition of ECM protein in response to persistent liver injury. The comprehensive characterization of human extracellular matrix molecular composition is very important to understand the pathogenesis of liver disease. Extracellular matrix is comprised of fiber and non-fiber macromolecules, such as collagen, elastin and proteoglycan.

During the time spent dynamic fibrosis, the equalization of extracellular grid renovating is changed, bringing about the difference in the quality, amount and conveyance of extracellular lattice protein in the liver. These prompts extreme collection of stringy tissue, by and large changes in protein and liver structure, and expanded extracellular framework thickness. The collagen substance of liver cirrhosis might be multiple times that of sound liver, and the collagen substance of type I and type III is the most elevated. Unevenness of extracellular grid rebuilding prompts a progression of sickness related extracellular and intracellular protein corruption items into the dissemination.

However, in the state of disease, the activity of these enzymes is impaired and / or maladjusted, which will lead to physiological disorder of extracellular matrix dynamics, loss of normal tissue structure and pathological deposition of extracellular matrix, all of which will lead to the pathogenesis of fibrosis and cirrhosis, renovation and homeostasis of extracellular matrix in HCC: significance for fibrotic disorders and cancers.

Even so, there are still a lot of scar formation, distorted liver structure and damaged liver function. Wound repair is a progressive process, in which the composition and hardness of extracellular matrix become very important. The local solidity of extracellular matrix is an important organic effector for cell behavior and tissue formation. The key steps to understand the role of extracellular matrix in liver disease tissue remodeling are:

1. The identification and quantification of extracellular matrix components;

2. The spatiotemporal dynamics of extracellular matrix molecules; and

3. The interaction of extracellular matrix protein network.

In particular, the cellular responses to extracellular matrix mechanical signals include disintegration, migration, multiplication, cell-cell and cell matrix adhesion changes. However, cell-derived extracellular matrix (ECM) is far from a natural liver scaffold, and it is not allowed to study ECM dynamics in the progress of liver fibrosis. In contrast, studies based on the enrichment of ECM proteins from homogeneous liver tissue do not allow the contribution of cell components to be reduced or eliminated, thus leading to overestimation of quantitative data obtained by proteomics. Therefore, it is still an important scientific challenge to decipher the molecular composition of human ECM from isolated liver scaffolds. Therefore, extracellular matrix creates a complex microenvironment, which is potential in nature. It is undergoing continuous remodeling not only in the process of development, but also in the process of differentiation and wound healing.

Mechanosensing and fibrosis / cirrhosis

Liver reproduction is a process by which the liver can substitute lost liver tissue from the swelling of residual tissue. The liver is immensely reformative because it can recover its operation and volume even after 70% partial resections of hepatic tissue. In the process of liver reproduction, with the accumulation of various growth factors and the remodeling of extracellular environment, the mechanical and chemical environment of liver has changed. Cells can detect the progressions of cell condition through different substance and mechanical sensors on their surface. These progressions are then transduced by starting various flagging pathways. The customary perspective on liver recovery depicts it as a progression of concoction flagging pathways.

These mechanosensitive instruments either create atomic signs that further actuate downstream flagging pathways, for example, Yap, or legitimately transduce mechanical signals by controlling the actin cytoskeleton. These signs are transmitted to the core and other dynamic communities to change the destiny of cells and actuate the capacities required for liver recovery, for example, the multiplication of different sorts of hepatocytes, the separation of liver undifferentiated organisms, extracellular framework renovating and the end signals directing the size of the recovered liver.

Diverse mechanical and compound signs organize the substance flagging pathways in cells, in this way advancing the recovery of liver. In ceaseless liver infections, for example, liver fibrosis and malignant growth, the liver is firm or hardened because of the perpetual actuation of hepatic stellate cells or entry vein fibroblasts as the grid of myofibroblasts. The mechanical power is controlled by the mechanical properties of extracellular network or the weight of circling blood stream/shear pressure, detected by the mechanoreceptors on the plasma film, and transmitted to the cell to influence cell work

In spite of the fact that hepatocyte growing and contracting can influence the aftereffects of elastography, the unbending nature or firmness of the liver increments with expanded phases of fibrosis. Solidness isn't just a result of ECM amassing and fibrosis, yet in addition a huge supporter for liver maladies, for example, fibrosis and disease.

Types of Mechanosensing

Cells periodically test their external environment. Any stress felt at the cell membrane is converted into a chemical signal across it. A cell membrane has adhesion receptors located on it that bind to surface molecules (extracellular membrane (ECM) components or other cells). The strength of this adhesion is converted to force-induced conformations within mechanosensory molecules. The mechono sensing occurs quickly within minutes (sometimes even in a few seconds); this leads to an early mechano response through the network of cytoskeletal filaments that are attached to the mechanosensory molecules.

Figure. 1

Mechanical detecting of nature can happen by means of film receptors (A), central grips to the ECM (B), and furthermore by means of cell-cell attachments, for example, adherens intersections (C) and hole intersections (D). The quality of the underlying mechanosensing occasion (for example the measure of power detected at the cell layer) animates a criticism framework inside the connected cytoskeletal organize. Following the underlying reaction, a cell produces more powers between the contractile fibers, proteins that interface the ECM to the cytoskeleton and the cell film. The mechanosensitive destinations along these fibers can advance a second influx of reactions. There are two kinds of mechanosensing; dynamic and inactive. Latent mechanosensing is otherwise called 'outside-in' mechanosensing, as it is characterized by outer powers being identified and transduced into the cell[1]. These forces incorporate strain, pressure, shear pressure and hydrostatic weight. On the other hand, dynamic mechanosensing is known as 'back to front' mechanosensing and is characterized by inward powers being created by the cell to identify changes in the outer condition. A typical model is the age of cell footing as intends to study the outer condition.

Passive mechanosensing can be exemplified by the location of fluid shear stress by endothelial cells, by means of a mechanosensory layer protein complex that connects the extracellular and intracellular environments[2]. Another model is that of intraluminal pressure recognition by blood vessel myocytes, through receptor-particle channel complexes[3].

Dynamic mechanosensing can be exemplified forcibly age to advance cell development from delicate substrates to stiffer substrates, in a procedure termed durotaxis and in the discovery of surface topology[4]. The age of powers required for cell relocation, to be specific footing, includes composed action between central grips and retrograde F-actin flow[5].

Mechanosensing, regardless of whether dynamic or detached, prompts intracellular reactions that are transduced through the cell and at last outcome in a setting explicit reaction.

Yap, Talin and RhoA GTPase activity regulation

Hippo effector YAP go about as on–off mechanosensing switches by detecting changes in extracellular lattice (ECM) organization and mechanics. The guideline of their action has been depicted by a various leveled model in which components of Hippo pathway are heavily influenced by central grips (FAs). The sub-atomic system by which cell spreading and RhoA GTPase movement control FA development through YAP to settle the jetty of the actin cytoskeleton to the cell layer. This component requires YAP co-transcriptional work and includes the enactment of qualities encoding for integrins and FA docking proteins. Tuning YAP transcriptional movement prompts the adjustment of cell mechanics, power advancement and grip quality, and decides cell shape, relocation and separation. The capacity of cells to see ECM mechanics and spread is related to Hippo pathway effectors Yes-related protein (YAP) and WW area containing translation controller protein 1 (WWTR1 or TAZ) carrying to the core to apply their co-transcriptional movement[6][7]. By authoritative to cell-and setting explicit translation factors, YAP/TAZ add to ECM renovating[8][9][10]. Central grips (FAs), the principle center for cell mechanosensing, go about as a scaffold between integrin-ECM association and the cytoskeleton[11]. Changes in the signs proliferated through FAs have been accounted for in harmful cells and are fundamental for tumor cell spreading[12].

YAP/TAZ atomic movement is corresponded to the strength of actin cytoskeleton and cell pressure, as constrained by myosin light chain II and Rho GTPase pathways[13][14][15]. Integrin-FA flagging has been as of late proposed to control Hippo pathway by phosphorylating huge tumor silencer (LATS) kinases through Src [16]. These outcomes anticipated a various leveled instrument by which Hippo effectors act as downstream sensors of ECM mechanics through integrin-FA flagging and by seeing cytoskeleton dependability. Here we portray the atomic premise of the crosstalk among the distinctive cell mechanosensing frameworks and propose a model by which YAP legitimately controls FA get together and cell mechanics.

The erased in liver malignant growth 1 (DLC1) tumor silencer quality, which is regularly inactivated in disease, encodes a Rho-GAP (GTPase actuating protein) central bond protein whose negative guideline of Rho-GTPases is important however not adequate for its full tumor silencer activity. The LD-like theme, which ties Talin and FAK, is required for the full tumor silencer action of DLC1 and adds to the relationship of DLC1 with central grips. DLC1 Mutants Deficient in Talin and additionally Tensin Binding Retain Rho-GAP Activity however Display Impaired Colocalization with Focal Adhesion Proteins.

Myofibroblasts transdifferentiated from HSCs are a significant wellspring of ECM creation in the liver and add to hepatic fibrosis [17]. Interestingly, a stiff environment alone is able to drive myofibrobastic activation of HSCs; it promotes HSC to express α-SMA and fibronectin, markers of stellate cell activation, and induces the migratory and contractile phenotype of HSCs by activating focal adhesion kinase (FAK), proto-oncogene tyrosine-protein kinase Src (Src), Ras homolog gene family, member A (RhoA), and yes-associated protein 1 (YAP1)[18][19].

Durotaxis or coordinated relocation toward a stiffer substrate, has been described in the fibroblasts and it is interceded by FAK-YAP1 mechanosignaling[20][21]. In this way, liver injury or a deregulated twisted recuperating in the liver prompts nearby HSC initiation and solidness and the neighborhood firmness makes an inflexibility inclination. Through durotaxis and chemotaxis, the encompassing HSCs push toward this region and collect at the injury site so a positive criticism circle structures to additionally build fibrosis and liver firmness[20]. Tumor knobs are commonly stiffer than the ordinary tissues as a result of a fibrotic reaction and ECM gathering known as desmoplasia or tumor solidifying[22].

Tumor solidifying can impact the harmful phenotype of malignancy by improving extracellular sign-controlled kinases (ERK) enactment, Rho/Rho-related protein kinase (ROCK)- created contractility, and central attachments (FAs) at the downstream of integrin grouping[23]. Moreover, disease related fibroblasts take an interest in the arrangement of far off metastatic destinations through comigration with malignancy cells and framing tracks inside the tissues, helping in malignant growth cell relocation[24][25]. Therefore, ECM mechanics and myofibroblast action add to the pathogenesis of liver fibrosis and disease.

The transmission of a power from the outside to the inside of a cell requires various cell modules, including mechanosensing receptors at the plasma layer, related protein edifices, and mechanotransducers, for example, insoluble cytoskeleton. The mechanosensing receptors incorporate integrins at cell-ECM intersections, cadherins and cell attachment particles (CAMs) at cell-cell contacts, stretch-enacted particle channels, receptor tyrosine kinase, etc [26]. These atoms identify the progressions of powers and advance tactile protein edifices for power intensification and transmission. FAK, Src, talin, vinculin, β-catenin, and α-catenin are mechanosensitive particles and they are enlisted to FAs or cell-cell intersections where they convert mechanical powers to biochemical signs.

Integrins and FAs

Cells are tied down to ECM through specific spots that are called FAs. FAs comprise of integrin groups and in excess of 150 proteins. Integrins are transmembrane receptors for ECM parts, for example, fibronectin, vitronectin and collagens[22]. There are more than 20 integrin heterodimers contained various blends of α subunits and β subunits. In human, there are 24 kinds of α subunits and 9 sorts of β subunits. Mechanical powers prompt the adaptation change of integrin β subunit to allow integrin bunching and authoritative of integrin to talin and vinculin, which are actin-restricting proteins (Fig. 2, cell 1). Inside a couple of moments after integrin bunching is actuated, FAK, Src, Phosphoinositide 3-kinases (PI3K), phospholipase C and other flagging atoms are enlisted to FAs with the goal that the powers are changed over into biochemical signs.

Figure. 2

Powers can actuate ERK, Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK) or Rho-family little GTPases flagging pathways to affect cell capacities (Fig. 2, cell 1). For instance, FAK/Src hand-off powers to RhoA/ROCK and RhoA/Diaphanous-related formin-1 (Diaph1/mDia) to tweak actin polymerization and actomyosin contractility significant for cell bond, spreading and movement[27].

Cadherins, selectins, and CAMs are grip atoms that sense mechanical powers at the cell outskirts[28]. E-cadherin assumes a noticeable job in framing adherens intersections in epithelial cells. To initiate adherens junctions, extracellular domains of cadherins engage in Ca² -dependent hemophilic trans-interaction with identical cadherin molecules on an adjacent cell, while their cytoplasmic tails bind to p120- and β-catenin proteins[29]. β-catenin interacts with α-catenin containing an actin-binding domain, so adherens junctions are physically linked to the actin cytoskeleton. Vinculin is phosphorylated at tyrosine 822 by Abelson tyrosine kinase in light of the grouping of cadherin-catenin atoms and it is enlisted to the cadherin edifices too (Figure 1, cell 2). The collaboration of the cytoskeleton and adherens intersections is controlled by RhoA and adjustment of adherens intersections is basic for the advancement of contact restraint of cell multiplication of epithelial cells[30].

E-Cadherin is frequently lost in human epithelial cancers, restoration of E-cadherin reduced cancer cell proliferation while disruption of E-cadherin promoted cell proliferation in a 3 dimensional (3D)-culture model. Additionally, the loss of E-cadherin-mediated cell adhesion was a rate-limiting step in the progression from β-cell adenoma to β-cell carcinoma in a murine pancreatic cancer model[27].

Mechanical stretch of the cell membrane of bacteria induced activation of the large conductance mechanosensitive ion channel (MscL) and the small conductance mechanosensitive ion channel (MscS) directly in vitro, demonstrating for the first time that this type of ion channel was sensitive to mechanical forces[31].

The cytoskeletal system of eukaryotic cells is chiefly made up by 3 kinds of the cytoskeleton fibers: actin microfilaments, microtubules and middle fibers. They structure a powerful system connecting the plasma layer to the cell core. The cytoskeletal network is important for keeping the shape of a cell, stabilizing a tissue, and providing resistance forces to cell deformation. When a FA or cell-cell junction forms, the actin filaments are coupled to the adhesion complex by talin, vinculin, or α-catenin. The major contributors to the cytoskeletal tension are myosin motors, and actomyosin contractility. These increase in response to mechanical forces[32].

Direct force transmission along the actin fibers occurs within seconds. This contributes to a rapid, large and global cellular deformation. When compared to this the biochemical signal mediated force transfer is much slower. It takes minutes to hours and mediates the effects of long-lasting mechanical stimuli. The direct force transmission and signaling is a combination of the above two. Hence, may be used to explain how a cell senses and responds to a variety of forces with different temporal and special scales[32].

Details of reported roles of Talin-1 and related signals in liver disease

Talin-1 is a cytoplasmatic protein that is encoded in human by TLN1 gene. It has a molecular weight of 270 kDa (2541 amino acids) and it is a central attachment protein connected to different grip particles, for example, integrins, vinculin, and actin. Talin-1 is significant for initiation of integrins. Because of initiation, integrins increment cell-to-extracellular framework (ECM) communications, so transduce bidirectional signs lastly controlling attachment, cell development, apoptosis, and tumor development. Liver fibrosis and cirrhosis are portrayed by a heightening seriousness of scarring of the liver with an ensuing dynamic loss of liver capacity and a raised danger of liver malignancy.

Talin-1 takes an interest in cell relocation and assumes a role in tumor arrangement, movement, and metastasis in various sorts of malignant growth. Chinese examiners have seen that the degrees of Talin-1 protein and mRNA articulation in HCC tissues are fundamentally lower than in the adjoining non-destructive tissue. Then again, talin-1 has been recognized by proteomic examination of liver homogenate of living giver liver transplantation as a promising marker for HCC. Elevated levels of Talin-1 articulation are connected with diminished attack and relocation just as diminished threat in human liver malignant growth cell lines; the concealment of Talin-1 advances intrusion and movement. An interesting element of liver disease is its nearby relationship with liver fibrosis. Over 80% of hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs) create in fibrotic or cirrhotic livers, proposing a significant job of liver fibrosis in the premalignant condition (PME) of the liver.

Talin-1 is an integrin administrative protein and it is fundamental for cell motility and grip. Cell grip is a urgent factor in cell motility in embryogenesis, aggravation, wound recuperating and neoplasm metastasis. Development of central grips is actuated by cell attachment and is a controlled procedure which is embroiled in cell development. Integrins and other cell grip particles manage various physiological and obsessive components by interceding the connection among cells and their extracellular condition. Talin-1 is significant for cell grip, the loss of talin may prompts the loss of cell attachment which may contribute in attack and metastasis of tumor cells.

Despite the fact that the hugeness of integrins in the development and movement of specific malignant growths is all around perceived, their inclusion in nonmalignant forms, for example, organ fibrosis or irritation, is just starting to rise. Be that as it may, gathering proof focuses to an instrumental job of integrin-interceded motioning in an assortment of ceaseless and intense noncancerous sicknesses, especially of the liver. Liver fibrosis comprises the uniform reaction of liver tissue to interminable injury and creates as an outcome of quickened network age and impeded corruption, somewhat activated by ceaseless irritation. Tooth et al., (2014) indicated that the intrusion and movement of liver disease cells were connected to talin-1 and the expanded attack and relocation were associated with decreased talin-1 articulation.

Integrins are a huge group of heterodimeric cell surface receptors, which go about as mechanoreceptors by transferring the data from cell to cell, and from the extracellular network (ECM) to the phone inside and the other way around. Since integrin receptors straightforwardly tie to parts of the ECM and control rebuilding thereof, they may assume a pivotal job in the development and movement of liver fibrosis. Notwithstanding auxiliary job, talin-1 assume basic job in integrin activation. Upon initiation, integrins increment the useful cooperation between a phone and the ECM, in this way fills in as bidirectional transducers of extracellular and intracellular signs, at last managing attachment, expansion, anoikic, endurance and tumor progression. Therefore, talin-1 interceded linkage of integrins to the actin cytoskeleton in central bond buildings is a dynamic, multicomponent plasma film related congregation fundamental for cell grip and motility.

Mechanical forces on framework integrin-cytoskeleton linkages are critical for cell practicality, morphology, and organ work. The creation of power relies upon the atomic associations from ECM-integrin edifices to the cytoskeleton. Furthermore, Jiang et al. showed that hindrance of fibronectin official to alpha-v-beta-3 integrin (193210 and 173470) and erasure of beta-3 particularly diminished the 2-pN power top. They recommended that talin-1 at first structures an atomic slip bond between firmly stuffed fibronectin-integrin buildings and the actin cytoskeleton, which can apply a low degree of power to fibronectin until numerous bonds structure or a sign is gotten to initiate a power reaction.

Mapping

Utilizing PCR enhancement and DNA from a board of human/rat physical cell half and halves, Gilmore et al. (1995) alloted the TLN quality to 9p. Cancellations in 9p have been ensnared in an assortment of malignancies. That a cytoskeletal protein related with the cell grip mechanical assembly, for example, talin, might carry on as a tumor silencer quality has been proposed. For instance, the APC tumor silencer quality (APC; 611731) encodes a protein that partners with beta-catenin (CTNNB1; 116806), a segment of a complex of proteins connected to the cytoplasmic essence of the cadherin group of cell-cell bond particles. So also, talin is a part of a complex of proteins connected to the cytoplasmic substance of integrins in cell-ECM intersections.

Co-localisations of TLN1

Integrin alpha-chains colocalized with talin, subject to the network substrate [33]]. These two proteins share a district of homology with talin and individuals from the FERM superfamily of proteins.We have verified that an utilitarian UNC-112::GFP combination protein colocalizes with PAT-3/beta-integrin in both grown-up and early stage body divider muscle [34]. Henceforth, F-actin and the cytoskeletal protein talin co-confined with beta 1 and alpha 4 integrin bunches at locales of cell-cell contact[35].

Analytical, diagnostic and therapeutic context of TLN1

To see how talin perceives integrin beta cytoplasmic spaces, we arranged surface plasmon reverberation technique to quantify the cooperation of talin with the beta3 integrin cytoplasmic area[36]. Both wild sort and freak alpha(IIb)beta(3), cleaned by RGD liking chromatography, bound to a comparable degree to immobilized talin[37]. Finally, microinjection of against talin antibodies brought about gathering of the integrins inside the cells[38]. Northern smudge examination distinguished TLN articulation in different human tissues, including leukocytes, lung, placenta, liver, kidney, spleen, thymus, colon, skeletal muscle, and heart. It has confined TLN to human chromosome band 9p13 by both fluorescence in situ hybridization and radiation half and half mapping[39]

Figure. 3

Figure-4 : Signalling Pathway of cell cycle

Talin-1 was playing a key role in signalling network:

The correspondence of extracellular lattice (ECM) with intracellular cytoskeleton is essential for controlling cell grip, cell shape change and cell relocation. Such correspondence relies vigorously upon integrins an enormous group of noncovalent heterodimeric attachment receptors. Integrins work by connecting with ECM ligands through their enormous extracellular areas and actin-restricting proteins through their short cytoplasmic tails (CT), in this manner connecting ECM with the cytoskeleton(Fig. 4). Various other intracellular proteins likewise associate integrins and the actin cytoskeleton yet in a roundabout way by means of shared restricting accomplices. These broad integrin-actin systems of protein–protein communications blend to frame discrete structures, central attachments, podosomes or comparable to structures, which establish dynamic center points of glue and flagging exercises. The impacts of talin on integrin work are expansive. It transduces flags across integrins in both the back to front and outside-in headings and it likewise impacts the association of the activity arrange and the organization of central attachments.

A significant part of the ongoing examinations on talin have stressed its one of a kind job in the back to front motioning of integrins; i.e., their change from their basal or "resting" state to an increasingly "dynamic" state in which they can draw in their related ECM ligands all the more proficiently (integrin initiation). Less underlined yet obviously reported is the impact of talin on integrin outside-in flagging (Fig. 4). Considerably less is known concerning the job of talin in the crosstalk between integrins of the equivalent or distinctive integrin subfamilies or with other flagging pathways. This audit will sum up ongoing development on talin structure and its control of integrin work and will address its job in integrin crosstalk..

Figure-5: Bi-directional signalling across integrin

Regulation of talin and its interaction with integrins:

Auto inhibition gives one instrument to control the elements of talin-interceded integrin enactment. Rivalry with negative controllers filamin, ICAP-1, β CT phosphorylation and lipid restricting give extra instruments that direct talin-interceded integrin enactment and cytoskeletal–integrin linkage. Talin contends with filamin, a negative controller of integrin initiation or ICAP-1 for covering restricting locales in integrin β CT. Integrin β CTs that have higher liking for these negative controllers tie talin less well. Phosphorylation of tyrosine buildups in the NPxY/F theme on β CT reduces talin authoritative and favors official of different accomplices, for example, Dok1, which ties specially to the phosphorylated β CT. Arrival of inhibitory limitation of talin-R on the talin PTB space by PIP2 uncovered destinations engaged with integrin actuation. This presentation encourages talin F2–F3 official to lipids inside the plasma layer subsequently orientating talin for increasingly great authoritative to β3CT. Early investigations built up that talin can be phosphorylated by PKC on serine (S) and threonine buildups, and resulting considers demonstrated that talin was additionally a substrate for calyculin and CdK5. Mass spectrometry uncovered around 30 phosphorylation destinations in talin, however just restricted information bolster an utilitarian essentialness to such post-translational change. Phosphorylation of S425 inside talin-H by Cdk5 forestalls authoritative to and therefore ubiquitination by Smurf1, accordingly managing the intracellular turnover of talin. Be that as it may, the physiological importance of phosphorylation of talin as far as impacts on integrin-related exercises is less clear. Thrombin invigorated platelets prompting upgraded PKC interceded talin-H phosphorylation is related with talin redistribution yet was autonomous of its proteolytic cleavage and integrin association. In chicken undeveloped organism fibroblasts, despite the fact that pressure fiber and central contact association was unperturbed by talin phosphorylation, forerunners of central contacts had diminished actin and talin-rich distensions. It has additionally been proposed that PKC-intervened talin phosphorylation might be engaged with central attachment dismantling.

Talin-1 is a protein that in humans is encoded by the TLN1 gene. Talin-1 is universally communicated, and is restricted to costamere structures in cardiovascular and skeletal muscle cells, and to central attachments in smooth muscle and non-muscle cells. Talin-1 capacities to intervene cell-cell grip by means of the linkage of integrins to the actin cytoskeleton and in the actuation of integrins. Altered expression of talin-1 has been observed in patients with heart failure; however no mutations in TLN1 have been linked with specific diseases.

The correspondence of extracellular network (ECM) with intracellular cytoskeleton is significant for managing cell grip, cell shape change and cell relocation. Such correspondence relies intensely upon integrins, an enormous group of noncovalent heterodimer (α/β) bond receptors. Integrins work by connecting with ECM ligands through their enormous extracellular spaces and actin-restricting proteins through their short cytoplasmic tails (CT), in this manner connecting ECM with the cytoskeleton. Talin, the focus of the article, together with filamin and α-actinin, are known to be the key players in this linkage, which can bind directly and simultaneously to both actin and integrin CTs. Various other intracellular proteins likewise interface integrins and the actin cytoskeleton however in a roundabout way by means of shared restricting accomplices. These broad integrin-actin systems of protein-protein collaborations combine to frame discrete structures, central attachments, podosomes or similar to structures, which establish dynamic center points of cement and flagging exercises.

The impacts of talin on integrin work are wide. It transduces flags across integrins in both the back to front and outside-in headings and it additionally impacts the association of the activity arrange and the sythesis of central attachment. A significant part of the ongoing examinations on talin have stressed its novel job in the back to front motioning of integrins; i.e., their change from their basal or "resting" state to an increasingly "dynamic" state in which they can draw in their related ECM ligands all the more proficiently (integrin initiation). Less stressed however obviously recorded is the impact of talin on integrin outside-in flagging. Considerably less is known concerning the job of talin in the crosstalk between integrins of the equivalent or distinctive integrin subfamilies or with other flagging pathways. This survey will sum up ongoing development on talin structure and its control of integrin work and will address its job in integrin crosstalk.

Role of talin

The crosstalk between flagging pathways makes mind boggling and entwined systems of correspondence, and integrin's discussion an excessive number of various pathways. By excellence of its ability to control integrin enactment and flagging, a job of talin in such integrin-interceded crosstalk can be derived albeit direct trial proof for talin's inclusion is constrained. Integrins αVβ3 and α5β1 and their initiation are fundamental for arrangement of a fibronectin-rich ECM, however the job of integrins in crosstalk stretches out past correspondence with the ECM. Motioning by integrins is unpredictably planned with that of different receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs) and other development factor receptors. Particular integrin-development factor receptor affiliations may drive distinctive flagging occasions because of explicit development factors. These communications license bidirectional crosstalk among integrins and RTKs and other development factor receptors during cell movement, malignancy metastasis, angiogenesis and early stage advancement. Since these cooperations equally impact flagging by means of RTK and integrins and is additionally affected by the actuation conditions of integrins, this crosstalk will probably be reliant on talin.

Crosstalk may likewise be utilized to portray how integrin commitment impacts the capacity of other integrin subfamily individuals. Such integrin interceded crosstalk may upgrade or hinder the capacity of the focused on integrin. Commonly, cell surface degrees of the focused on integrin are not decreased yet rather the control is applied by means of a flagging system. For instance of the positive agreeably between integrins, αvβ1 integrins were found to work working together with α5β1 integrin to advance spreading of cells on fibronectin. All the more broadly contemplated has been the limit of one integrin to stifle the action of another integrin. Requirements for the suppressive impacts of one integrin on another are the ligand-involved high proclivity compliance and an unblemished β CT. Most accentuation has been given to the correspondence somewhere in the range of β3 and β1 CTs with the β3 CT working as the negative controller i.e., β3 applied a trans-predominant impact on β1. These impacts have been exhibited utilizing both follower, HEK, HUVEC [150], and suspension K562 cells, with restraint of α5β1 intervened relocation on and phagocytosis of fibronectin by ligand-involved αvβ3. Notwithstanding the imperative job of the β CT, a crucial job of the β transmembrane area in this crosstalk has been illustrated.

Chimeric β integrins have been utilized to test endogenous integrin work, under the reason that the illusory receptors could contend with the endogenous integrins for cytoplasmic proteins that are required for integrin intervened capacities. Expanding upon this speculation, Calderwood et al. inferred that it was rivalry for talin that underlies the trans-prevailing restraint of integrin actuation. They demonstrated that transformed β CT deficient in talin restricting couldn't intervene trans-predominant hindrance and this concealment was turned around by overexpression of integrin actuating pieces of talin. Along these lines, the sequestration of talin by the suppressive species is both important and adequate for trans-prevailing restraint of integrin enactment. Talin overexpression was appeared to ease the concealment of explicit integrins plated on non-authoritative ligands. Ligand involved β1 integrins have been exhibited to enact PKA that can smother stream instigated initiation of αvβ3 integrins. PKC is engaged with agonist animated αIIbβ3 integrin initiation on platelets. PKC enacted Rap1, can communicate with RIAM to advance integrin initiation by enrolling talin to the plasma layer. Along these lines, the RIAM-talin hub could likewise be engaged with between integrin correspondence. Henceforth, a model of talin intervened integrin crosstalk can be imagined whereby invigorating signs unfurl the talin atom to uncover talin-H, prompting fondness tweak of integrins by means of official of talin-F3 to β integrin CT. Upon ligand commitment and integrin grouping, flagging pathways lead to either restraint of other integrin species, or enhancement of enacting signals for talin to additionally enlarge integrin initiation.

Talin and integrin outside-in signalling Integrins:

This bond receptors that are fit for bidirectional flagging. Similarly as intracellular signs can be transduced over the film to initiate the ligand restricting capacity of integrins, ligand official and other outer ecological prompts can likewise be transmitted through ligated integrins to the β CT and downstream flagging falls inside the cell that at last effect development, endurance, separation and expansion of the cell. These occasions are alluded to as "outside-in flagging" (see Fig.1).Clustered integrins advance phosphorylation and hence enactment of FAK. Initiated FAK can tie Src, a nonreceptor tyrosine kinase, or other Src family kinases, (SFK) shaping buildings which enlist extra proteins to central bond locales. Flagging by means of the FAK–Src module not just influences beginning times of bond, and advances cell spreading, yet in addition can destabilize central attachments to permit movement of cells.

Therefore, numerous outside-in flagging occasions from involved integrins rely upon or lead to improvements in the actin cytoskeleton. For instance, platelet subordinate clump withdrawal relies upon inhabitance of integrin αIIbβ3 and the related adjustments of the actin cytoskeleton. Taking into account the significance of talin in interfacing integrins to the cytoskeleton, no doubt talin should aid such outside-in reactions, and there are information to help this idea. Be that as it may, the particular subtleties with respect to how talin is engaged with outside-in flagging stay unsure. In one situation, talin-H may separate from integrin β CT to encourage integrin outside in flagging. This system might just be included since just talin-R however not talin-H was recognized in central bonds in Drosophila and Tln1−/− mouse early stage fibroblasts. This procedure could be helped by calpain or PIP2 which separate talin-H from talin-R and is known to assume basic job in integrin outside-in flagging. Moreover, since β CT tyrosine phosphorylation separates talin from integrin, the idea that there is a revision of talin-intervened integrin-actin association upon integrin initiation and inhabitancy is upheld. Talin-H separation would likewise permit integrin CT to tie different proteins, for example, kinases and phosphatases known to trigger intracellular flagging pathways, initiate cell reactions and cytoskeletal adjustments.

In any case, since generally outside-in flagging reactions are transduced by grouped integrins, flawless talin is expected to connect integrins and actin sooner or later during the outside in flagging reaction. There is additionally proof that not all outside-in reactions are talin subordinate. In CHO cells, talin enlistment was seen as a post-integrin initiation occasion, advancing cell spreading by repressing the integrin β1A–FLNA collaborations. GPCR flagging can expand the partiality of α4β1 integrins on monocytes, however this expansion in proclivity seems, by all accounts, to be free of talin, kindlin3 or α-actinin. Or maybe, these integrin β restricting accomplices, including talin, appear to balance out the obligations of α4β1 integrin bunches with the cytoskeleton. Subsequently, all things considered, the job of talin changes over the span of outside-in flagging reactions. Integrins are essential middle people of mechano transduction. Because of the use of power, talin is selected to integrin groups.

Hence, under strain, talin's job may not be as an integrin activator, however as a middle person of mechano transduction signals and fortified of cytoskeletal associations. This understanding was bolstered by considers including single particle following and super-goals microscopy in living cells, which recommended that transport of integrins into central bonds was talin autonomous. Integrins diffusing into these central grips were hypothesized to be therefore initiated by talin enlisted from the cytosol. This grouping of occasions would then prompt fibronectin commitment by the enacted integrins in the central attachments. Talin may likewise have works other than integrin enactment. In Tln1−/− undeveloped fibroblasts, their glue phenotype was advanced distinctly by an unblemished IBS-2 in talin-R. At central attachments, just talin-R and not talin-H was watched. In mammary epithelial cells, talin-R was seen as instrumental in enrolling FAK, vinculin and p21 to direct cell multiplication. An elective pathway was shown in which integrin groups enrolled FAK in beginning attachments without a commitment from talin. In certain tissue-or formative explicit murine models, integrin initiation was unaffected even upon talin knockout. Along these lines, talin can keep up cytoskeletal respectability or forestall debasement of β1 integrins other than enacting integrins parse.

Talin is a key controller of the correspondence between the actin cytoskeleton and the ECM. This capacity relies upon the limit of talin to fill in as a coupling accomplice of different proteins, including actin and other actin restricting proteins and integrins. Integrin commitment by talin controls their ability to change their enactment state by partiality and additionally energy tweak. This connection likewise helps with intervening the outside-in flagging that happens through ligated integrins. Integrins address each other and to an assortment of other layer receptor frameworks and the downstream flagging that they coordinate. Talin, by prudence of its immediate relationship with and guideline of integrins, would give off an impression of being fundamentally associated with this crosstalk. To grasp the full job of talin in such crosstalk, transformations of explicit elements of talin, some of which have been accounted for and others that despite everything should be created, ought to be described for their impacts on the capacity of other cell receptor frameworks with an eye on eventually testing the outcomes of such crosstalk in model cell frameworks and entire living beings.

Potential role in Talin-1 function on liver fibrosis that report on scientific paper

Hepatocellular carcinoma is a major health problem. More than 700000 cases are diagnosed yearly. Hepatocellular carcinoma is the 6th most common malignancy and the third most regular reason for disease related passing. There are a ton of hazard factors for the advancement of HCC for example viral hepatitis, aflatoxin, and so on. In the previous years, AFP had upper hand in the diagnosis and follow up of patients. Unfortunately, recent guidelines had neglected it and depended mainly in the radiological diagnosis (European Association for the Study of the et al.). However, there are focal lesions that are equivocal in the diagnosis, hence the need for various biomarkers though the debate on clinical utility. Recently there is trend towards non-invasive diagnosis of liver fibrosis and portal hypertension. Various models were postulated. But the question is “are they beneficial in patients with HCC”. Serum talin-1 in a recent study was a useful biomarker of HCC. Patients with HCC had higher serum AFP and talin 1 than those with just cirrhosis; (123.3±35.59 vs. 80.2±26.6 ng/ml; p=0.006) and (61.63±2.47 vs. 17.24±4.78 ng/ml; p=0.001) respectively. The serum talin 1 levels were unaffected by the gender. At a cut off equals 33.75 ng/ml; the talin 1 had 100% sensitivity, 87% specificity, 88% PPV and 100% NPP. Meanwhile at a cut off equals 9 ng/ml the AFP had 80% sensitivity, 65% specificity, 69% PPV and 76% NPP. When both are combined, at cut off equals 33.75 they had 100% sensitivity, 57% specificity, 70% PPV and 100% NPP. APRI score was prescient in HBV patients of hepatocellular carcinoma and postresection repeat in HBV patients. High APRI esteem is related with HCC repeat after radiofrequency removal. FIB4 score is related with the improvement of HCC in longitudinal investigations and is helpful in the appraisal of the forecast. Lord's score is viable list for anticipating generally speaking endurance in hepatitis B-related HCC (Pang et al., 2015. It might be helpful whenever incorporated to BCLC framework. As of late ALBI score created as a superior model for evaluation of the liver capacity in patients with HCC and appraisal of the anticipation. It was proposed be to incorporated in BCLC framework and necessity of sorafenib treatment, fibrosis list score, GUCI score (Islam et al., 2005) and Fibro-α score were not in our insight evaluated in patients with HCC. In the present examination patients with HCC had higher estimations of serum AFP, serum talin-1, AST/ALT proportion, FIB4 score and fibro-α score than those with cirrhosis in opposition to the fibrosis record score.

The presence of large sized focal lesions with total size ≥5cm was associated with higher ALBI score value than those with less size unlike serum talin-1 and the fibrosis index score. The rest of studied scores were useless. None of the studies variables were more associated with malignant vein thrombosis. The serum talin-1, AST/ALT ratio, fibro-α score had the better sensitivity and specificity than the rest of the studied scores. The cut off of serum talin-1 was 17.235ng/ml. It was lower than previously studied cut off. It is not affected by the gender or the presence of portal vein thrombosis.

Conclusion

In the end, Hepatic fibrosis is the reliable reaction of liver tissue to constant injury. Integrin-actin frameworks of protein–protein correspondences mix to outline discrete structures, focal connections, practically identical to structures, which build up unique focus purposes of paste and hailing works out. The effects of talin-1 on integrin work are sweeping. It transduces hails across integrins in both the back to front and outside-in headings and it similarly impacts the relationship of the action mastermind and the association of focal connections. Talin-1 is to be exceptionally communicated in HCC cells comparative with non-disease liver epithelial cells and to advance tumor development and metastasis. Talin-1 has been accounted for to cooperate with various attachment atoms (for example integrin and F-actin) and to initiate the integrin pathway. The significance of integrins in the advancement and improvement of certain tumors has been perceived for some time. In any case, late proof has featured the significant pretended by integrins in non-threatening procedures, for example, organ fibrosis and aggravation.

References:

1. Holle AW, and Engler AJ. More than a feeling: discovering, understanding, and influencing mechanosensing pathways. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2011; 22(5):648-54. [PMID: 21536426]

2. Tzima E, Irani-Tehrani M, Kiosses WB, Dejana E, Schultz DA, Engelhardt B, Cao G, DeLisser H, and Schwartz MA. A mechanosensory complex that mediates the endothelial cell response to fluid shear stress. Nature 2005; 437(7057):426-31. [PMID: 16163360]

3. Sharif-Naeini R, Folgering JHA, Bichet D, Duprat F, Lauritzen I, Arhatte M, Jodar M, Dedman A, Chatelain FC, Schulte U, Retailleau K, Loufrani L, Patel A, Sachs F, Delmas P, Peters DJM, and Honoré E. Polycystin-1 and -2 dosage regulates pressure sensing. Cell 2009; 139(3):587-96. [PMID: 19879844]

4. Teixeira AI, Abrams GA, Bertics PJ, Murphy CJ, and Nealey PF. Epithelial contact guidance on well-defined micro- and nanostructured substrates. J. Cell. Sci. 2003; 116(Pt 10):1881-92. [PMID: 12692189]

5. Gardel ML, Sabass B, Ji L, Danuser G, Schwarz US, and Waterman CM. Traction stress in focal adhesions correlates biphasically with actin retrograde flow speed. J. Cell Biol. 2008; 183(6):999-1005. [PMID: 19075110]

6. Wang, K., Degerny, C., Xu, M. amp; Yang, X.-J. YAP, TAZ, and Yorkie: a conserved family of signal-responsive transcriptional coregulators in animal development and human disease. Biochem. Cell Biol. 87, 77–91 (2009).

7. Zhao, B., Li, L., Lei, Q. amp; Guan, K.-L. The Hippo-YAP pathway in organ size control and tumorigenesis: an updated version. Genes Dev. 24, 862–874 (2010).

8. Dupont, S. et al. Role of YAP/TAZ in mechanotransduction. Nature 474, 179–183 (2011).

9. Calvo, F. et al. Mechanotransduction and YAP-dependent matrix remodelling is required for the generation and maintenance of cancer-associated fibroblasts. Nat. Cell Biol. 15, 637–646 (2013).

10. Lian, I. et al. The role of YAP transcription coactivator in regulating stem cell self-renewal and differentiation. Genes Dev. 24, 1106–1118 (2010).

11. mbauld, D. W. et al. How vinculin regulates force transmission. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 110, 9788–9793 (2013)

12. Sood, A. K. et al. Biological significance of focal adhesion kinase in ovarian cancer: role in migration and invasion. Am. J. Pathol. 165, 1087–1095 (2004).

13. Mo, J.-S., Yu, F.-X., Gong, R., Brown, J. H. amp; Guan, K.-L. Regulation of the Hippo-YAP pathway by protease-activated receptors (PARs). Genes Dev. 26, 2138–2143 (2012).

14. ] Morikawa, Y. et al. Actin cytoskeletal remodeling with protrusion formation is essential for heart regeneration in Hippo-deficient mice. Sci. Signal. 8, ra41 (2015).

15. Lucas, E. P. et al. The Hippo pathway polarizes the actin cytoskeleton during collective migration of Drosophila border cells. J. Cell Biol. 201, 875–885 (2013)

16. Kim, N.-G. amp; Gumbiner, B. M. Adhesion to fibronectin regulates Hippo signaling via the FAK-Src-PI3K pathway. J. Cell Biol. 210, 503–515 (2015).

17. Friedman SL. Mechanisms of disease: Mechanisms of hepatic fibrosis and therapeutic implications. Nat Clin Pract Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2004;1(2):98–105. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

18. Olsen AL, Bloomer SA, Chan EP, et al. Hepatic stellate cells require a stiff environment for myofibroblastic differentiation. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2011;301(1): G110–118. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

19. Bosch-Fortea M, Martin-Belmonte F. Mechanosensitive adhesion complexes in epithelial architecture and cancer onset. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2018; 50:42–49. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

20. Lachowski D, Cortes E, Robinson B, Rice A, Rombouts K, Del Rio Hernandez AE. FAK controls the mechanical activation of YAP, a transcriptional regulator required for durotaxis. FASEB J. 2018;32(2):1099–1107. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

21. Lachowski D, Cortes E, Pink D, et al. Substrate Rigidity Controls Activation and Durotaxis in Pancreatic Stellate Cells. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):2506. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

22. Gkretsi V, Stylianopoulos T. Cell Adhesion and Matrix Stiffness: Coordinating Cancer Cell Invasion and Metastasis. Front Oncol. 2018; 8:145. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

23. Paszek MJ, Zahir N, Johnson KR, et al. Tensional homeostasis and the malignant phenotype. Cancer Cell. 2005;8(3):241–254. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

24. Xu Z, Vonlaufen A, Phillips PA, et al. Role of pancreatic stellate cells in pancreatic cancer metastasis. Am J Pathol. 2010;177(5):2585–2596. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

25. Gaggioli C, Hooper S, Hidalgo-Carcedo C, et al. Fibroblast-led collective invasion of carcinoma cells with differing roles for RhoGTPases in leading and following cells. Nat Cell Biol. 2007;9(12):1392–1400. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

26. Lim CG, Jang J, Kim C. Cellular machinery for sensing mechanical force. BMB Rep. 2018;51(12):623–629. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

27. Thumkeo D, Watanabe S, Narumiya S. Physiological roles of Rho and Rho effectors in mammals. Eur J Cell Biol. 2013;92(10-11):303–315. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

28. Fassler R, Meyer M. Consequences of lack of beta 1 integrin gene expression in mice. Genes Dev. 1995;9(15):1896–1908. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

29. Ingber DE. Tensegrity: the architectural basis of cellular mechanotransduction. Annu Rev Physiol. 1997; 59:575–599. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

30. Klezovitch O, Vasioukhin V. Cadherin signaling: keeping cells in touch. F1000Res. 2015;4(F1000 Faculty Rev):550. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

31. Sukharev SI, Blount P, Martinac B, Blattner FR, Kung C. A large-conductance mechanosensitive channel in E. coli encoded by mscL alone. Nature. 1994;368(6468):265–268. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

32. Mathieu S, Manneville JB. Intracellular mechanics: connecting rheology and mechanotransduction. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2019; 56:34–44. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

33. Alpha 3 beta 1 integrin is moved into focal contacts in kidney mesangial cells. Grenz, H., Carbonetto, S., Goodman, S.L. J. Cell. Sci. (1993) [Pubmed]

34. The UNC-112 gene in Caenorhabditis elegans encodes a novel component of cell-matrix adhesion structures required for integrin localization in the muscle cell membrane. Rogalski, T.M., Mullen, G.P., Gilbert, M.M., Williams, B.D., Moerman, D.G. J. Cell Biol. (2000) [Pubmed]

35. Co-clustering of beta 1 integrins, cytoskeletal proteins, and tyrosine-phosphorylated substrates during integrin-mediated leukocyte aggregation. Sánchez-Mateos, P., Campanero, M.R., Balboa, M.A., Sánchez-Madrid, F. J. Immunol. (1993) [Pubmed]

36. Calpain cleavage promotes talin binding to the beta 3 integrin cytoplasmic domain. Yan, B., Calderwood, D.A., Yaspan, B., Ginsberg, M.H. J. Biol. Chem. (2001) [Pubmed]

37. Identification of a talin-binding site in the integrin beta(3) subunit distinct from the NPLY regulatory motif of post-ligand binding functions. The talin n-terminal head domain interacts with the membrane-proximal region of the beta(3) cytoplasmic tail. Patil, S., Jedsadayanmata, A., Wencel-Drake, J.D., Wang, W., Knezevic, I., Lam, S.C. J. Biol. Chem. (1999) [Pubmed]

38. Talin controls the exit of the integrin alpha 5 beta 1 from an early compartment of the secretory pathway. Martel, V., Vignoud, L., Dupé, S., Frachet, P., Block, M.R., Albigès-Rizo, C. J. Cell. Sci. (2000) [Pubmed]

39. Characterization of the human talin (TLN) gene: genomic structure, chromosomal localization, and expression pattern. Ben-Yosef, T., Francomano, C.A. Genomics (1999) [Pubmed]

请支付后下载全文，论文总字数：58887字