论文总字数：15894字

摘 要

2018年3月，《中华人民共和国监察法》（以下简称《监察法》）颁布，意味着监察体制在国家层面的正式确立。为了配合监察体制的建立，同年10月，《中华人民共和国刑事诉讼法》进行了相应的修改，将贪污贿赂犯罪和国家工作人员渎职犯罪的案件管辖权由检察机关转隶到监察机关，区分了两者的职责。然而，新《刑事诉讼法》虽然对监察委员会和检察院的职能衔接问题做了相应的规定，但是却存在着衔接的漏洞：如在调查权和侦查权、强制措施等方面两部法律存在着立法不协调、不一致以及立法中的相对缺失等。这些问题都反映出了监察权和检察权衔接不畅。因此，为了解决实践层面中存在的监察委员会和检察院衔接不畅问题，需要进一步完善相关衔接机制的构建，例如调查权和侦查权的衔接与完善，完善强制措施的衔接问题以及落实检察院的公诉职能。只有这样才能实现监察权和检察权的高效合作和顺畅衔接。

关键词：监察权；监察权；合作衔接

Abstract

In March 2018, the supervision law of the People's Republic of China (hereinafter referred to as the supervision law) was promulgated, which formally established the supervision system at the national level. In order to coordinate with the establishment of the supervision system, in October of the same year, the criminal procedure law of the People's Republic of China was amended accordingly, transferring the jurisdiction of corruption and bribery crimes and malfeasance crimes by state functionaries from the procuratorial organs to the supervisory organs, and distinguishing the responsibilities of the two. However, although the new criminal procedure law has made corresponding provisions on the function connection between the supervisory commission and the procuratorate, there are still some loopholes in the connection: for example, the two laws have inconsistent and inconsistent legislation in the aspects of investigation power, investigation power and compulsory measures, as well as the relative lack of legislation. All these problems reflect the poor connection between supervision and procuratorial power. Therefore, in order to solve the problem of poor connection between the supervisory commission and the procuratorate in practice, it is necessary to further improve the construction of the relevant connection mechanism, such as the connection and perfection of the investigation power and the investigation power, the connection and perfection of the compulsory measures, and the implementation of the public prosecution function of the procuratorate. Only in this way can we achieve efficient cooperation and smooth connection between the supervisory power and the procuratorial power.

Key Words:Supervisory power; Supervisory power; Cooperation

目录

中文摘要……………………………………………………………………………… Ⅰ

英文摘要……………………………………………………………………………… Ⅱ

引言…………………………………………………………………………………… 1

一、监察权和检察权概述…………………………………………………………… 2

（一）监察权性质与范围………………………………………………………………2

（二）检察权性质与范围………………………………………………………………3

（三）监察权和检察权的关系……………………………………………………… 5

二、监察权和检察权运行中的衔接及存在问题…………………………………… 6

（一）调查权与检察机关侦查权之间的关系……………………………………… 6

（二）人身强制措施的衔接………………………………………………………… 8

1.留置措施的适用对象和条件…………………………………………………… 8

2.留置措施的决定程序…………………………………………………………… 8

3.检察机关“决定逮捕”问题…………………………………………………… 8

（三）监察机关与检察机关法律监督的程序衔接………………………………… 9

三、完善监察权和检察权合作的有效机制……………………………………… 10

（一）完善调查权与侦查权的衔接——以授权方式明确侦查权…………………… 10

（二）人身强制措施的完善……………………………………………………… 11

1.明确留置措施的适用条件……………………………………………………… 11

2.规范留置的决定程序…………………………………………………………… 12

3.明确检察机关逮捕程序………………………………………………………… 13

（三）落实法律监督………………………………………………………………… 14

结语……………………………………………………………………………… 16

参考文献…………………………………………………………………………… 17

致谢…………………………………………………………………………………… 19

引言

一、研究背景

请支付后下载全文，论文总字数：15894字