论文总字数：21525字

摘 要

近年来随着我国经济社会的发展，国际地位的提高，我国与国外政府或者私人主体间的经济来往日益频繁，在此过程中会出现诸多的涉外民商事诉讼案件，由此而来的就是会发生管辖权的冲突或者说选择法院的冲突。因此，国际民事诉讼中的协议管辖制度就会在调和这些矛盾与冲突中发挥重要的作用。国际民事诉讼中的协议管辖制度有助于协调管辖冲突以及确定管辖权。这一制度目前被世界上绝大多数的国家所接受，并且作为意思自治原则在国际私法领域中的体现，各国也在自己的法律体系中确立了有关国际民事诉讼中的协议管辖制度。但是，在实践中仍然会出现立法的不完善以及在实际的纠纷解决中出现矛盾和争议，这些不完善一方面会导致关于协议管辖的相关条文在运用时不会充分发挥其效用，不利于纠纷的解决，于当事人不利；另一方面，这些不完善也会使我国民事诉讼中的协议管辖制度与国际环境下协议管辖制度不相接轨，不利于我国司法制度的发展。

本文将会介绍民事诉讼中协议管辖制度的概念及其历史发展、我国目前的立法现状及《民事诉讼法》中关于国际民事诉讼中的协议管辖条款的规定及其不完善之处、不方便法院原则与协议管辖的关系、比较法视野下的协议管辖，例如，美国与德国在协议管辖方面的立法实践、欧盟“布鲁塞尔体系”以及海牙《选择法院协议公约》的基本概况以及我国是否需要加入等问题，由此对我国国际私法中的协议管辖制度的提出完善的建议。

关键词 ：国际民事诉讼 协议管辖 意思自治

Research on the International Civil Jurisdiction by Agreement

Abstract

In recent years, with the development of China's economic and international status, the economic exchanges of China and foreign governments or private person have become increasingly frequent, and many cases of foreign civil and commercial litigation will appear in this process, where the conflicts of jurisdiction or the choice of court will occur . Therefore, the International Civil Jurisdiction by Agreement will play an important role in reconciling these contradictions and conflicts.As the matter of facts,The International Civil Jurisdiction by Agreement Law will help coordinate the conflict of jurisdiction and determine the jurisdiction. Also, This system is currently accepted by most of the countries in the world , and as the principle of autonomy in international private law, each country has established their own system of International Civil Jurisdiction by Agreement. However, there are also many disadvantages in reality and contradiction and controversy , which, on the one hand, make the article of law can’t make sense that is harm to person, and on the other hand, make Chinese International Civil Jurisdiction by Agreement is not accordance with International Civil Jurisdiction by Agreement of other countries that does harm to the development of Chinese International Civil Jurisdiction by Agreement.

This article will introduce its origin and history, the present situation of legislation in China and the article of Civil Procedure Law and its disadvantages, forum-non-convenience doctrine, foreign legislative practice , such as the legislation practice in the US and German ,the “Brussels system” and the “Hague Convention on choice of court agreement” which will have essential influence on our legislation system and whether we need to join it, according to these facts and articles, I will give some suggestions on how to improve Chinese International Civil Jurisdiction by Agreement.

Key words: International Civil Procedure；Agreement Jurisdiction；Recognition and enforcement of Judgement；

目 录

摘 要 I

Abstract II

一、国际民事诉讼中的协议管辖概述 1

（一）协议管辖基本概念 1

（二）协议管辖的历史发展 1

1.权利保护说 2

2.维护法律秩序说 2

3.纠纷解决说 2

4.多元化说 2

（三）协议管辖的功能 3

（四）不方便法院原则与协议管辖关系评述 4

二、我国民事诉讼中涉外协议管辖的现状评析 4

（一）我国协议管辖立法评述 5

1.我国《民事诉讼法》及其司法解释规定 5

2.“实际联系”原则评析 5

（二）我国协议管辖制度中的主要问题评析 7

1.《民事诉讼法》及其司法解释关于“实际联系”原则的限制 7

2.书面形式对协议管辖的限制 8

三、比较法视野下的国际民事诉讼协议管辖 8

（一）美国协议管辖的立法实践 8

（二）德国协议管辖的立法实践 9

（三）欧盟“布鲁塞尔体系”的概况 10

（四）海牙《选择法院协议公约》 11

四、我国民事诉讼中涉外协议管辖的完善 12

（一）完善我国《民事诉讼法》中涉外协议管辖的法律规定 12

1.关于“实际联系”原则的完善 13

2.关于协议管辖形式要件的完善 13

（二）海牙《选择法院协议公约》对我国协议管辖的启示 13

（三）协议管辖效力认定及完善建议 15

1.协议管辖形式要件和实质要件效力认定 16

2.协议管辖效力的准据法选择构建 16

结 语 17

参考文献： 18

致 谢 20

请支付后下载全文，论文总字数：21525字